- Is Ecosia legit or a scam?
- Does Ecosia really plant all those trees?
- Ecosia vs Google
- Ecosia Privacy
- How to Uninstall Ecosia
- Conclusion on Ecosia as a Search Engine
What is the Ecosia browser?
A few weeks ago a Dutch friend of mine introduced me to Ecosia, the Berlin-based social enterprise eco search engine that uses their profits to plant trees (that’s a mouthful).
The idea immediately clicked with me for a few reasons I’ll discuss below.
Ecosia has a model that’s ripe to explode with a millennial generation that truly does care about how sustainable their products are. Unfortunately projects that set out to do great for the world often receive criticism, and the Ecosia search engine won’t be immune.
There were two major things that I wanted to learn about Ecosia:
-
-
- Is Ecosia legit? Or is it a scam?
- Does it work as well as Google?
-
Let’s make legitimacy the first thing we look at in this Ecosia critique because that’s the most important part.
Is Ecosia legit or a scam?
There are a few things that come to mind that they could be doing to try to mislead users if they wanted to, such as:
-
-
- Not planting the trees they claim to
- Collecting user data to resell or other privacy issues
- Offering misleading search results for their gain
- Monitoring your data illegally with their browser extension
-
I think the big concern here is that they might not be planting the trees they claim to be. In 2019 Ecosia claims to have surpassed 65 million trees planted.
While this is well shy of the ~1.5 trillion trees that experts say are needed to offset the carbon we’ve added to the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution, it’s still nothing to laugh at. Ecosia after all is still a pretty small company with roughly 8 million users (although this is growing really fast).
As far as the misleading search results or collecting data go, this isn’t really something we can test. But given the track record of the team at Ecosia I’m pretty confident they aren’t out to scam people.
Ecosia does however get criticism from a few sites online, including an article from 2Spyware claiming that Ecosia is a browser-hijacker, and borderline virus.
While you can’t really dispute the claims made by 2Spyware, just keep in mind that literally everything they criticize about Ecosia is also true for Google, Bing, Yahoo, and any other search engine you use.
They claim that Ecosia may hijack your search results and place ads in them… ummm yeah that’s exactly the point, we’re trying to pay for trees here! But they do it in no way different than when Google places ads in your search results, Google just dishes out the profits to their investors instead of planting trees.
They even go as far as to say “getting rid of the Ecosia virus”, which is just absurd to me. I have a feeling this article was written by someone who hasn’t ever used Ecosia and was directed to write about Ecosia being a virus to get the search traffic.
While I do think those accusations against Ecosia aren’t based on rationality, I also have to acknowledge that they could be true, just like Google could be a virus.
My advice is to check out the Ecosia team and see if these are folks you’re willing to trust with your online data. Personally, I’m not concerned about an ecosia.org virus.
Is Ecosia fake?
Quite a few people have written in and asked if Ecosia is downright fake. A lot are even curious if there’s an Ecosia Snopes article to verify their claims. I’m doing my best to fill those shoes and more in this article.
Usually it comes back down to the four points I had listed above, but many who write in aren’t even sure if the extension is going to work properly. You’ll see in the coming paragraphs that of anything you can say about Ecosia, their product is definitely real, so I think we can lay that one to rest.
Does Ecosia Really Plant All Those Trees?
I can point you to two different resources for this. The first one is their financial reports, and the second is their tree projects. The financial reports will have to be taken at face value as Ecosia is not a public company, there is no Ecosia stock, or all the auditing and regulation that comes with it.
Ecosia Financial Reports
Update August 2019: This article was originally written in March 2018 so I’m updating the financial report as they have grown from investing €421,370 per month to a whopping €815,378 per month in July 2019 (nearly $1,000,000 per month on trees!).
Looking through the past 4 years of financial reports looks to be quite consistent. Don’t let the fact that €815,378 is only 52% of their monthly revenue of €1,567,995 fool you into thinking that they aren’t honoring their pledge to use 80% of profits to plant trees, you have to subtract out the expenses before making the calculation.
So basically:€1,567,995 – (€475,862 + €78,465) = €1,013,668 (Revenue – (Operating Costs + Spreading the Word) = Total Profit)
Then take €815,378 / €1,013,668 = .8044 or 80.44% (Tree Planting Spend / Total Profit = % of Profit Spent on Tree Planting)
So this means in July Ecosia claims to have spent slightly more than their goal on planting trees. They’re also being smart and packing away a significant amount of money for the future — with a reserve of €198,290 — because they’ve got a new initiative to make bigger investments like the solar plant in
Remember though, this is a self reported breakdown that as far as I can tell has not been independently audited. How do we actually know if Ecosia is planting these trees or not?
Tree Projects Supported by Ecosia
From what I’ve been able to find Ecosia is currently supporting projects in the following countries around the world:
- Peru
- Brazil
- Madagascar
- Nicaragua
- Haiti
- Colombia
- Spain
- Morocco
- Senegal
- Burkina Faso
- Ghana
- Ethiopia
- Uganda
- Kenya
- Tanzania
- Indonesia
Ecosia sent me the countries above in May 2015 as the complete list where their projects are. Hopefully they’ll keep sending updates as they come. You can also check out Ecosia’s tree projects blog to see some really cool content about what they’re doing with the money. The Tanzania post has some really cool footage!
I’ve also received quite a few messages from readers that are involved in Ecosia’s reforestation projects. Not that this couldn’t be faked, but they all seem very real.
I would love it if someone working with Ecosia would send some pictures from the front lines that I can put in this article. If that’s you, send me a message.
How does Ecosia make money?
Ecosia makes money in the same way that Google’s search engine makes money, through search engine ads. I say search engine because Google makes money hand-over-fist in a ton of other ways beyond its core search engine product.
So this means if you search for local plumbers on Ecosia and click one of the advertised services, 80% of the amount that the plumber pays for that ad will go to planting trees (after deducting expenses as pointed out by Lee in the comments), pretty cool huh??
One of the reasons I’m pretty excited for the future of Ecosia is because as of now it’s only a simple search engine and it’s making a pretty decent chunk of profit, imagine if they create a display ad network, video platform (like YouTube), data & cloud services, and everything else Google does. Ecosia could single handedly plant all the trees that the earth needs, and maybe even move on to support other good causes as well.
Ecosia vs Google
**UPDATE: Ecosia now has some cool shortcuts as pointed out by Felix in the comments. If you type in #g after your search it will take you straight to Google, #fb takes you straight to a Facebook search, #yt for YouTube, etc. You can see the full list of shortcuts on Ecosia’s support page on search tags.**
So there are a variety of ways to compare the two services. I’ll break it down into two main parts: utility and user experience. I want to make sure I’m setting realistic expectations here. Google is the 8 gazillion pound gorilla in the room. They’ve spent billions of dollars over more than 20 years making the best search tools imaginable.
We simply can’t expect Ecosia.org to outperform Google in just about anything besides doing amazing things for our planet by planting trees (although they do win at one other thing, check it out below).
What I’m saying is let’s keep in mind that the main goal is to do good for the planet, and find what level of sacrifice we’re willing to endure to make that happen.
Also, keep in mind that Ecosia does have a development team so their search engine should only improve with time. I wouldn’t expect it to ever beat Google unless there’s a sudden mass migration to the eco-friendly search engine, but maybe the sacrifices will diminish.
Lastly, Ecosia is built on top of the Microsoft Bing search engine so you’ll find that many of the core limitations of Ecosia are actually limitations of Bing.
Alright so let’s start off with the utility of Ecosia.org vs Google.com.
Utility of Ecosia vs Google
This is all about how much time each search engine is able to save and the quality of information delivered. Do you have to click through to an article to find out what time a show is at or will it be delivered in rich snippet like Google often does? Are relevant results being shown?
Let’s take a peek at what Ecosia is capable of. I think literally everyone reading this is familiar with Google so I’ll mostly only provide images of Ecosia unless the comparison makes sense.
Unit Conversions
One of those things that I’ve really come to take for granted with Google is being able to quickly rattle off one unit and ask for another. Ecosia does a decent job at this. They’ve got most of the basic conversions, like inches to centimeters:
Distance Calculation
As a frequent traveler I use this feature a lot. Unfortunately Ecosia isn’t able to calculate simple distances in the search engine results page (SERP) yet. This is a pretty big bummer:
Ecosia Maps
Currently when you want to use the maps feature on Ecosia.org it will take you straight to Google Maps. In my eyes this is way better than trying to hack together some in-house solution that really doesn’t work well (looking at you Apple).
I wouldn’t even dock them any points for this because they send you to the best service available and there isn’t much lag time in the redirect.
Definitions
Here’s another area where Ecosia is trailing behind Google. I love how when I google a single word Google seems to know if I’m searching for a definition. I tried typing in “social enterprise” and “define social enterprise” and neither of them brought up that incredibly useful rich snippet definition that I’ve taken for granted on Google.
Then take a look at what happens if you type the same search in on Google. You don’t have to click through to get the full definition. Often times the rich snippet on Google is even better than this one, saving you from having to click through to another page:
You also get that awesome frequently asked questions box with Google, I haven’t seen that at all in Ecosia.
User Experience of Ecosia vs Google
As much as I love what Google is able to do, I have to admit over the last year or two I’ve been getting increasingly frustrated with how aggressive they’re getting with their advertising. I’m a digital marketer by day so I saw first hand the effect of Google’s rollout of the Local Service ads last summer.
Basically they introduced an entirely extra set of ads when someone searches for local service providers, they just package them in a cute new way:
Notice anything funny about that page? Literally everything that shows up on the screen when searching for a local service provider is a paid advertisement. Then, you scroll down and see the map with listings below it which are NOT paid, but still not totally organic results (you have to register with Google to be in this). Only when you scroll down to practically the bottom of the page do you see organic search results.
Compare this to Ecosia when searching for a local service provider:
I mean there are still a lot of ads. But at least I can see some results that weren’t paid to be placed. This seems like a fundamental freedom of using the internet. I understand that Google’s search engine is a product provided by a company and they’re free to do whatever they want with it, but honestly I think that they’re pushing it too far with this.
How can they claim that they’re following their mission statement to..
“Organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”
Ecosia Privacy
A lot of people seem to be asking about this recently. To me that’s good news. It means more and more people are waking up to the fact that we need to take some action for the environment and do something simple like use an alternative search engine.
I’ve read through Ecosia’s privacy policy quite in-depth and have found:
- nothing that isn’t standard in privacy policies
- a lot less scary stuff than Google has
I will say — you aren’t getting the same kind of pro-privacy with Ecosia as you would with something like DuckDuckGo — but for me it’s a happy middle ground. Your tolerance will vary based on how hardcore you are for protecting your online privacy.
How to Uninstall Ecosia Extension
As great as Ecosia’s mission is to solve many of the world’s greatest problems by planting trees funded with search revenue, it’s understandable that for some the convenience of Google’s advanced features will prevail. If this is you, then have no fear because it’s pretty easy to uninstall Ecosia at any time.
Assuming you’ve installed the Ecosia extension on Google Chrome follow these instructions:
-
-
- Go to the drop down menu with three dots in the top right of the browser
- Hover over More Tools
- Click on Extensions
- Find the Ecosia extension and either click the toggle switch to deactivate it, or Delete to completely uninstall it
-
That’s it, now you’ve uninstalled the Ecosia.org extension and all your settings will go back to what they were before. Hopefully you’ll reconsider in the future for the sake of the planet :)
Conclusion on Ecosia Search Engine
As of now Ecosia falls short of Google in certain areas. The question of whether or not it’s still worth using Ecosia will depend on your level of dedication to protecting the environment. Eventually we as a society will have to begin making lifestyle compromises if we don’t want our grandchildren to end up living in climate controlled glass bubbles.
What I’ve decided to do is have Ecosia as the default and if it doesn’t give me the results I’m looking for I just use the awesome shortcuts pointed out by Felix in the comments.
I’m really hoping that Ecosia builds out some new features in the coming years so I won’t even have to think about Google though.
I worry that if a person isn’t willing to have a little sacrifice in the utility of their search engine for the sake of the environment, are they willing to sacrifice anything?
Join 8+ million of us saving the world with Ecosia:
**FYI -- this link has patharoundtheworld in it but it is NOT an affiliate link, I do not earn anything for you installing. Ecosia simply gave me the link so I could know how many trees this article has helped plant.
I got to see a presentation by Ecosia at the Regeneration Festival in Spain at the world’s first Ecosystem Restoration Camp. I was impressed and have been using Ecosia ever since. Sometimes the results aren’t as good as Google, especially regarding snippets that don’t require you to click through any further than the search to get your answers, but I fully believe that they are committed to Ecosystem Restoration and tree planting. I’m sure they would share their data with you on actual trees planted.
Thanks for the deep dive review!!
Glad you enjoyed the review. Anything neat you learned there about Ecosia that you don’t see here?
Super helpful article! I just downloaded Ecosia less than an hour ago to my chrome book before completely panicking on the decision. But this definitely made me feel better and was nice to get an honest review. Thanks!
I’ve heard that one before! The false claims that it’s a virus or whatever other nonsense has probably scared people into just getting rid of it without doing research, so props to you for looking into it instead of panic uninstalling!
I have been seeing more and more adverts for Ecosia but I’ve had a hard time finding reviews for this. Add a growing frustration with chrome and firefox having hiccups, you get the deal right? Thanks for this clear, straight to the point review. I’m off to check out Ecosia.
Come back and let us know how it goes!
Bing is the Ecosia backend, and they don’t use 100% renewables. Because of this, using Ecosia is actually significantly worse than using Google, despite what they say about being greener.
As mentioned in another comment, I see where you’re coming from, and I don’t have a concrete argument to this, but I’m curious how the compounding effect of trees reproducing over time stands up to the one-time avoidance of using electricity to power a search (a miniscule amount of energy to begin with per search).
Hi Nick, this was an interesting article for someone who is considering Ecosia. I do have a question though, how would you respond to the opinion that using Ecosia is ultimately not better for the environment than using Google because Bing does not rely on renewable energy and Google does, as described in the following post https://www.quora.com/Is-Ecosia-better-for-the-environment-than-Google
Yeah that’s definitely interesting and not something I have a great answer for. It’d take some fairly complex calculations to figure out which is better in the long run.
One thing I can say about planting trees is that trees reproduce which means in 100 years there should be a compound possibly even exponential effect from planting trees, whereas using clean energy in the first place more so just avoids the energy burn.
Would be great if someone who does these kinds of projects for a living could tune in with some details.
Your unbiased review reads like a paid for advert. You have not considered the privacy claims made by Ecosia. This app is advertised under the banner “Privacy and Trees”. You say plenty about trees but hardly anything about Privacy.
Try comparing Ecosia with Duck Duck Go. That would highlight Privacy in ways which comparison with the worlds biggest advertising agency does not. Although we all love trees I suggest that when considering search engines we want to know how well it works and the extent to which it provides privacy, or not.
We also want to know a bit about the reviewer. A statement that you write for kicks doesn’t give much away and brings to mind the guys who stand in the street shouting about the end of the world.
FYI b4 u ask I get some of my kicks in bed, which is where I am writing this.
Sorry to hear you didn’t like the review David. You’re right, I didn’t really cover the privacy issue. This wasn’t a DuckDuckGo vs Google review which the main concern of the user considering DuckDuckGo is definitely privacy. Most people who are wondering about Ecosia are curious about the tree planting, not so concerned about privacy.
If enough people share your concern I’ll dive into that as well.
Not really following the writing for kicks equal to standing in the streets crying wolf but I’m sorry if it came off that way.
Just FYI, I actually came here off the back of me searching FOR EcoAsias privacy stuff, so I’d love to see an update backing that up!
Yeah that’s a solid idea I’ll look into adding that this week.
Do you think that Ecosia is an ethical company? if so why?
Hi Nick, thanks for your excellent and useful review. But still I have concern about Ecosia actually plants trees.
Any clarification from your chatting with Ecosia team? Ecosia could become very popular, but to do so .. transparency should be greatly improved in my opinion. They are a private company, but for sure paying a Big Four audit on their finacial reports would be value for money. Thanks for your time
Simonetta
Agreed on the transparency. I have a hunch that’s something that they’ll do as they grow, but at this point I’m guessing bringing in a big auditing firm would be too pricy.
Hopefully someone at Ecosia will tune in on this with a comment.
Can you use Ecosia with an ad blocker?
Not sure I haven’t tried as that would completely defeat the purpose of Ecosia — they can only plant trees if they get ad revenue.
I have recently come across Ecosia. July 2, 2019. One item I don’t understand is all the talk about ads. If I have my adblocker on, there are no ads. If I allow the site to post ads, there still are none. In general, I’m always surprised by people who say there are too many ads on a page. Even in Chrome, I am able to block them. Not that I want ads, but am I missing something? If the only way Ecosia makes profit for tree planting is if I click on the ads, well I’m unable to after adding site to trusted?
I’d like to read a response to this point. I’m having exactly the same experience. Excellent article, by the way :)
Hi,
just saying, in the meantime ecosia implemeted the definition snippets.
Nice thanks for the heads up!
I’m keen to support them over the mad G-bot, and really appreciate your research and article.
I’m REALLY hoping a similar eco-caring group starts up to replace FaceHook with a more communitarian, thoughtful and/or not-for-profit (or even community-operated) social media hub.
This was an excellent review. Thank you for this.
Glad you liked it Michael!
Just a typo you wouldn’t catch except for an old lady like me: search for this string “beyond it’s core search engine product.” and note that the apostrophe in “it’s” should not be here…. Thanks for your great article.
Thanks Gina, it’s easy to let one of those slip every now and again!
The only downside us when on a forum i click on an embedded link to another site it gives me a blank screen. I reported this to Ecosia probably about a month ago and have not heard anything at all from them. I am using an iphone 6S and their app. I know the links are correct and they work in other search engines. Really disappointed that Ecosia havent bern bothered to reply.
For what its worth i am sick of google search results for example searching for any word and i get an ad from amazon. It could be dead people and amazon would have a link. Thats one of the reasons i ve binned google and also that they appear to avoid paying taxes.
I admired this browser very much for its effort towards nature. I just have a doubt that if i open other websites like instagram.com , google.com, facebook.com..etc., . will all the time spent in those websites using through this browser be beneficial to ecosia.. or its beneficial only when its redirecting to the mentioned website ?!!
Hey Prem — so it won’t help when you’re on Facebook, Instagram, or Google. These sites all serve their own ads, and the ads are the only way Ecosia earns money to be able to plant trees.
It’s actually pretty inaccurate that Ecosia has taken on the name Ecosia “browser”, because it really isn’t a browser. It just changes the default search provider to its own search engine.
I Use Ecosia since some month and I really miss the rich snippet, so I found myself using the #g way too often. However, what I also miss in your article is no mention at all of Bing, as it is at the end of the day Microsoft’s search engine which is behind ecosia.
Thanks for the artile though.
Did anyone here even bother having a look at their blog or their podcast or watch their videos before asking stupid questions here?
https://blog.ecosia.org/
You are doubting if these guys are planting trees as if they’re putting the hands in your pockets, how about questioning what’s Google’s contribution besides doing whatever they want with your information?
What is costing you to change platforms? Don’t use if it’s offending you this much.
Honestly people just love bitching and complaining. I’d love to see you all actually doing your bit for climate change and helping disadvantaged communities instead of all being keyboard warriors.
Ive recently switched because I couldn’t take the google ads anymore. Ecosia is far cleaner and efficient at finding the search results I need. They are streamlined and on top of it they plant trees. Why would I want to give my money to someone like google who works for the government and develops ai drones that kills people, and on top of it lies about it. At least with this search engine even if they are lying (which I doubt) at least its not about developing weapons to murder people.
Other than using inferior search engine Bing, the number of trees indexes as you think about and enter the search term. That is distracting at the wrong time.
Thanks for the review! I just started using Ecosia after learning about it from my teenage son. Like you said, it’s not Google, but I’m more than willing to give up a few more seconds for some trees planted. And the #g etc were some good tips; I’m eager to try those out. But very happy with it so far.
This was really helpful! I was following Ecosia for a day, and started panicking at the thought that Ecosia was a liar! This put my mind to rest though. Thank you!
Thank you for the in-depth info. As an oldtimer, I actually remember Google being just one of loads of different search engines (remember Lycos, anyone?!). I even remember switching from Yahoo as my main browser to Google upon recommendation – so switching again seems a lot less scary this time round. And everything I have now read about Ecosia all just sounds good.
Awesome to hear you’re making the move Annette. Hopefully it’ll be the last time you have to change!
Hi Nick,
thanks for the attempt. I would like to know that Ecosia is the best search engine for the planet, but indeed avoiding to compare the “green performance” of the underlyinh crawler Bing with Google is a serious weakness.
And then worst, the financials. Even if I want to trust what Ecosia is reporting, I am worried to see the breakdown of the € 815 378 they claim they invested that month into tree planting :
€ 105 378 paid out to projects
€ 710 000 added to a “tree-planting fund”
If you compare the 105 378 paid to projects with the 1 567 995 income, that makes less than 7% of their revenur that month really invested into tree planting. This is ridiculous.
Of course it doesn’t mean that the fund won’t finally translate into planted trees, but then it’s a big mistake to report on one single month in this infographics, and the above cannot convince anyone that the money really goes into trees planting.
It would really help to see the same kind of infographics but giving the figures from theit foundation, or for the last year for which the accounts are closed.
Hoping that would still convince me to continue using Ecosia, but I admit I’m looking at Lilo as well, and might leave Ecosia if I don’t find satisfying answers to the 2 questions:
– Impact of Bing vs impact of Google
– Real and audited investments of Ecosia in tree planting
So unbiased review maybe in your intention, but still partial :-)
Kind regards,
Michel
Hey Michel,
You present some valid points. Regarding your concerns that they may not actually be planting trees with the foundation, keep in mind they are a certified B-Corp and part of the Purpose Foundation — which makes them legally obligated to do good for the climate.
I’m sorry you didn’t feel the review was unbiased.
Thanks for the article. Ecosia now has a travel feature. It seems they regularly roll out new features to keep apace. Ecosia makes money when trips are booked through them.
Cool! I haven’t done any travel searching lately so didn’t notice. Thanks for pointing this out.